Luciano Emanuel Ambrogi vs Franco Ribero Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do recent second serve performance stats look? Ambrogi won 44.26% of points on their second serve, while Ribero won 41.52% in the last 6 months.
• Who's ahead in return game stats recently? Ambrogi excelled by winning 45.3% of opponents' second serve points; Ribero follows at 41.82%.
• In terms of first serve returns, Ambrogi again leads with 32.52% over Ribero's 28.16%.
• Can Ribero handle pressure better? Ribero saved 57.33% of breakpoints versus Ambrogi's 51.99% under pressure.
• Ambrogi secured 61.73% of matches over the past year, while Ribero managed to win 39.13%.
• On their best surfaces, Ambrogi shines on Clay with a 62% win rate. Ribero performs best on I.hard, winning 54% of matches.
• Ambrogi played mainly in Challengers/ITF events > $10K, winning 57.14%; Ribero frequented Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K, winning 45.45%.
• Who's encountered tougher competition? Ambrogi's opponents had an average rank of 364.64, marginally below Ribero's 355.89.
• If the match enters a deciding set, Ambrogi has a slight edge with a 52% success rate, compared to Ribero's 47%.
• What about break point conversion? Ribero converted an impressive 41.67% of break chances, outpacing Ambrogi's 33.92%.

Editorial Prediction (May 26, 2025, UTC):

Both players showcase distinct strengths; however, Ambrogi appears to have the edge in several key areas. His recent form in second serve and return game performance slightly outpaces Ribero's, which is crucial for gaining an advantage in matches.

Furthermore, Ambrogi's overall win percentage over the past year indicates a higher likelihood of securing victories. Although Ribero exhibits a stronger breakpoint conversion and resilience under pressure, these might not suffice to outweigh Ambrogi's superior performance metrics.

Finally, with Ambrogi's favorable stats on clay, his higher win rate, and slight edge in deciding sets, Ambrogi is likely to emerge as the winner in this upcoming match.